nanog mailing list archives
ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"?
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () gettcomm com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:09:15 -0400
I just received an email from Verisign customer service requesting I "refresh my information:" on an active domain that doesn't expire until 2004. My concern is that the request specifically stated ICANN required them to do this.
On searching the ICANN-Verisign contract at the ICANN site, I could find no requirement for refreshing. I'm concerned this may be a covert marketing activity, since the web page for "refreshing" very easily could have led me into buying services from Verisign. This seems to be of operational interest to service providers hosting domains, if Verisign/Netsol can confuse people into shifting their service to them.
Am I completely off base here? Is there some ICANN requirement I've missed?
Current thread:
- ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Howard C. Berkowitz (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Jake Baillie (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Richard Forno (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Jim Mercer (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? amar (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? todd glassey (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Peter Galbavy (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Jake Baillie (Jun 18)