nanog mailing list archives

RE: /24s run amuck... again


From: "Alexander, Nathan M" <nathan.alexander () qwest com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:17:42 -0400


That is of limited usefulness.  1)  They'd all have to have the same next
hop.  2) you would have to hear all three /24's of them from all your peers,
all with the same next hop, metrics, med, etc.  Otherwise the aggregate
route becomes the backup route for other, more specific announcements of the
/24 that you can't aggregate.  It would be nice for the single homed, but
then why are you running bgp?

Nathan Alexander
NMC Shift Manager
703/363-5293(office)
301/442-8695(cell)
877/541-2189(pager)
Nathan.Alexander () qwest com

- Internal Use Only - Disclose and Distribute only to Qwest Employees and
authorized persons working for Qwest. Disclosure outside of Qwest is
prohibited without authorization.



-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Doncaster [mailto:ralph () istop com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: /24s run amuck... again



On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

With all the recent talk about filtering, I figured now was 
a good time
to update my list of evil /24 announcers... There are 
currently over 63k
/24s out of 113k total unfiltered announcements (over 55%).

Does anyone (Cisco, Juniper, etc.) have an auto-aggregation feature?
Let's say a router that receives the following prefixes under 
a single AS
206.51.128.0/24
206.51.129.0/24
206.51.131.0/24

And the following network is not in the table:
206.51.130.0/24

Then it would be usefull to collapse it into a single 206.52.128/22
aggregate (especially if the metrics & communities are the same).

-Ralph




Current thread: