nanog mailing list archives
RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links?
From: Scott Weeks <surfer () mauislanwanman com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:40:26 -1000 (HST)
: A cisco ping is not bursty, to the extent of hundreds of mb/s. Also, cisco : ping doesn't offer 4,000 pings/sec. No, but you can start 6 simultaneous sessions to the router and have 5 of them pinging the other side of the circuit while looking at the 6th session to watch for traffic levels and errors. You'd be surprised how much traffic you can push when you set the packets to as big as you can and as fast as you can. I don't know how bursty a traffic pattern this would create, though. scott
Current thread:
- fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- Ok, I give up - Pipeline 75 Dennis L. Shreve (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Scott Weeks (Jul 16)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 16)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Vincent J. Bono (Jul 15)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Martin Hannigan (Jul 16)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Paul Vixie (Jul 18)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 16)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Peter John Hill (Jul 16)