nanog mailing list archives
RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd)
From: Chris Parker <cparker () starnetusa net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 14:08:18 -0500
At 03:01 PM 7/1/2002 -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
[deleted] the second network. If they peer, their traffic ratio will be 1:1 yet both networks gain significant ( imho ) benefit. Bill and keep seems the only sensible way to me.--- If they peer, the traffic ratio will _NOT_ be 1:1, more like 10:1 or 1:10 [depending on which way you are looking].
Whoops. I rewrote that part and forgot the 'nowhere near'. -Chris -- \\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker \ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless! \ Director, Engineering | @ @ | \ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116 oOo---(_)---oOo--\------------------------------------------------------ \ Wholesale Internet Services - http://www.megapop.net
Current thread:
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Ukyo Kuonji (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Chris Parker (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Chris Parker (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) E.B. Dreger (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) E.B. Dreger (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd) Chris Parker (Jul 01)