nanog mailing list archives
Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6)
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:00:56 +0200
--On Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:16:38 -0700 David Meyer <dmm () sprint net> wrote:
Given the amount of time and resource we've spent on multicast, the question one might ask is "why hasn't multicast succeeded"? My guess is that it is because the demand from any of the potential users of the service just isn't there (not at internet
...and perhaps also because there is "enough" bandwidth currently, and that adding bandwidth is easier/cheaper/more stable/more well known than enabling multicast?
Just a guess. - kurtis -
Current thread:
- RE: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6), (continued)
- RE: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Sinn (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Meyer (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Stephen Sprunk (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Meyer (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Toerless Eckert (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Joel Jaeggli (Jul 09)
- Message not available
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Leo Bicknell (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Toerless Eckert (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Meyer (Jul 09)
- RE: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) David Sinn (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Petr Swedock (Jul 09)
- Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jul 11)