nanog mailing list archives
OT - Importance of Content
From: "Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL)" <sowens () epik net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:49:40 -0400
I was wondering the importance of content to IP providers. Is it feasible to go after a lot of hosting companies and such as a business model and greatly skew your traffic ratios to hopefully reach a critical mass. I would think at some point you would have so much content that people would start to come to you for peering or to purchase access to get to that content which would cause a reduction in overall transit costs, but what would that critical mass be and how valid is that thought? Opinions? Shane Owens
Current thread:
- OT - Importance of Content Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL) (Jul 10)
- Re: OT - Importance of Content Joseph T. Klein (Jul 10)
- RE: OT - Importance of Content Scott Patterson (Jul 10)
- RE: OT - Importance of Content David Diaz (Jul 11)
- Paying for delivery of packets (was about Sprint Peering, and Importance of Content) JC Dill (Jul 11)
- Re: Paying for delivery of packets (was about Sprint Peering, and Importance of Content) E.B. Dreger (Jul 11)
- Re: Paying for delivery of packets doesn't work Mike Leber (Jul 13)
- Re: Paying for delivery of packets doesn't work Mike Leber (Jul 13)
- RE: OT - Importance of Content David Diaz (Jul 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: OT - Importance of Content Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL) (Jul 10)