nanog mailing list archives

RE: WorldComm Fiber Cut????


From: James Smith <jsmith () PRESIDIO com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 12:34:22 -0400

Ah, but she didn't say she believed it. Just said where the data was...

Do we really need to verify what it shows? At best, it shows that they have
spotty reporting. At worst, it shows rather severe reliability problems.
Take your pick...


James H. Smith II NNCDS NNCSE
First Call Response Center
Professional Services - Network Engineer
The Presidio Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: Internet Guy [mailto:internetguy205 () hotmail com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:22 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut????



HHHMMM... Very interesting.  Someone who believes what a 
carrier really 
tells them.

If you go to the MFN homepage & click on the graphs listed 
below, then you 
might see that possibly the data being displayed is both 
inaccurate, as well 
as misleading.

Go to SJC OC3 Los Angeles, to OC192 SJC3 to SJC4, to OC12 
MaeW ATM, OC48 # 2 
for IAD to NYR, IAD # 2 to PAIX VA OC48, DCA2 to DFW2 OC48, 
PAIX OC12 to 
Core1.sjc, NPA - DS3 to San Jose, LGA1 OC192#2 to IAD, LGA1 
OC48 to Chicago, 
NYC Backbone OC192 to LGA2, NYC Backbone OC48 # 2 to 
core3.lga1, ETC...

Each one of these graphs shows abnormalities in the flow of 
internet data, 
such as "pits", spikes, square wave function graphs, clipping on some 
waveforms, etc.

This is not limited to MFN.  I have observed this on other 
similiar types of 
Sundry network data collection systems.

It is not easy to see HOW BAD the problem is with these Sundry data 
collection systems, UNTIL you expand the MRTG graph.  Once 
this is done, 
then you can really see how bad the integrity of the 
collected data really 
is.  A small MRTG graph really masks the problems associated 
with the data 
which is being displayed.  With a larger graph, you 
definately see the 
problems associated with todays Sundry systems.


As there is no way to really verify the QUALITY or INTEGRITY 
of the data 
being displayed, then I submit as fact, that what is being 
shown here is 
really in a grey area, at best.

So who really knows how correct, the data which is being 
displayed on the 
MFN home page is really is ?

Cause with the clipping, spiking, pits, & squarewave graphs, 
small graphing 
scale being shown, definately, I have my doubts ...

One would also wonder, that if this data collection system is 
used by MFN to 
generate bills for customers of MFN who are charged by the 
Megabyte, what 
these customers bills look like & HOW accurate these bills 
really are...

Regards,

Mike Martin.

From: "Pawlukiewicz Jane" <pawlukiewicz_jane () bah com>
To: "nanog () merit edu" <nanog () merit edu>
Subject: Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut????
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 10:52:18 -0400


MFNs status page is:

http://www.mfn.com/network/ip_networkstatus.shtm#sjc

Jane

Sean Donelan wrote:

On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Gerardo A. Gregory wrote:
Can someone from WorldComm please verify a fiber cut 
that happened 
today at
around 11:30 am (Central).  I have bveen informed that 
a fiber cut in
Illinois (or Indiana) has been in effect (until just a 
few minutes) 
for all
of the afternoon and most of the evening.

Worldcom is reporting a problems near Chicago.  Earthlink 
is reporting
problems affecting its customers in Indiana, Illinois, 
Iowa, Michigan,
Wisconsin and Ohio.

http://help.mindspring.com/netstatus/
http://www.noc.uu.net/

Cable & Wireless is showing delays out of Cleveland, Ohio

http://sla.cw.net/

AT&T and Sprint aren't reporting any problems.

http://ipnetwork.bgtmo.ip.att.net/index.html
http://www.sprint.net/

MFN's and PSI's network status pages have stopped working 
for me, so I
don't know if they are having problems.

http://www.above.net/html/techlog.txt
http://www.psi.net/cgi-bin/netstatus.pl5




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Current thread: