nanog mailing list archives
Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:16:12 -0400
On Sun, 07 Jul 2002 12:45:13 PDT, Clayton Fiske <clay () bloomcounty org> said:
Don't forget 3) the machine compromised isn't capable of spoofing. In Win95/98/ME/NT, there is no raw socket functionality. I don't
The fact that there is no raw socket *API* doesn't mean it's that much more difficult to convince the device driver to send a packet that isn't strictly kosher. -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- DOS attack from PANAMSAT Roy (Jul 06)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Rizzo Frank (Jul 06)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Rob Thomas (Jul 06)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 07)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Clayton Fiske (Jul 07)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 07)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Clayton Fiske (Jul 07)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 07)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Rob Thomas (Jul 06)
- Re: DOS attack from PANAMSAT Stephen Griffin (Jul 07)