nanog mailing list archives
Re: wcom overbilling
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 06 Jul 2002 16:35:59 -0700
I would just like to mention that while our Worldcom bills were *always* wrong, our UUnet bills have always been exactly correct. My only hope is that when this mess settles down, UUnet is still maintained as a separate entity.
Ditto, on both points. (1) When MIBH was a UUNT customer a few years back, I had to scratch my head over the bills because their periodicity was bizarre, but every payables audit we did showed that we owed exactly what they'd billed. (2) It's possible that Rick would not recognize his old network any more, but I do, and I very strongly hope that UUNT won't share WCOM's fate, if negative. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- wcom overbilling Chris Beggy (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Dan Hollis (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Vincent J. Bono (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Robert Boyle (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Dave Stewart (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Bruce Robertson (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Paul Vixie (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Vincent J. Bono (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Jeff Mcadams (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Marshall Eubanks (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling blitz (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Robert Boyle (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Scott Weeks (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Robert Boyle (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Dan Hollis (Jul 05)
- Message not available
- Re: wcom overbilling Hank Nussbacher (Jul 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: wcom overbilling joe mcguckin (Jul 06)