nanog mailing list archives
RE: Internet vulnerabilities
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote: > http://www.cisco.com/public/cons/isp/essentials/ip-anycast-cmetz-03.pdf Yes, this document correctly described IPv4 anycast. It somewhat overstates the severity of the issue with TCP and the dynamicism of the underlying network topology... Although that's often brought up by people who've never used anycast before and think they're being clever, in actual deployed networks it's accounted for less than 0.001% of total traffic volume, or far less than is generally lost across the network anyway. It also describes the group-membership-announcement issue, which is basically a non-issue now that all the host vendors can support OSPF, which neatly fills the need. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities, (continued)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Stephen Griffin (Jul 07)
- WorldComm Fiber Cut???? Gerardo A. Gregory (Jul 07)
- Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut???? Sean Donelan (Jul 07)
- Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut???? neil d. quiogue (Jul 07)
- Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut???? Pawlukiewicz Jane (Jul 08)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 07)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 07)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 05)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (Jul 05)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Marshall Eubanks (Jul 05)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 05)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Daniel Golding (Jul 08)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities jnull (Jul 05)