nanog mailing list archives
BGP Pollution
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr () isprime com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 23:49:59 -0400
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *>i203.168.78.0 66.230.128.97 40 100 0 2914 6453 4755 4755 4755 4755 4755 4755 17632 17632 17632 17632 17632 17632 17632 17632 17632 17632 17632 i *>i217.220.42.0 66.230.128.97 40 100 0 2914 1239 1267 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 21164 I Is there any possible excuse for such ugly looking as-paths? (these are the worst offenders, but there are plenty more that are still really bad...) --Phil
Current thread:
- BGP Pollution Phil Rosenthal (Jul 04)
- Re: BGP Pollution Pascal Gloor (Jul 04)
- Re: BGP Pollution Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 05)
- RE: BGP Pollution Phil Rosenthal (Jul 05)
- RE: BGP Pollution Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 05)
- Re: BGP Pollution Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 05)
- Re: BGP Pollution Pascal Gloor (Jul 04)