nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet vulnerabilities
From: Pete Ehlke <pde+nanog () ehlke net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:42:50 -0500
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:35:32PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
But I'm sure there are probably more subtile ways to do it. As with all good vulnerabilities, it takes someone who is working on the inside to REALLY know how to muck things up... Fortunately the terrorists seem to be concerned with killing thousands of innocent people and scaring millions, not pissing off a few nerds and disrupting eBay's profit margin for a week. As much as we like to think we are important, I'd hardly put them in the same class.
Or, you could work behind the scene, get Michael Powell appointed to the FCC, and make sure there are no brakes on the shortsightedness of lawyers at the RIAA, the MPAA, and the US RBOCs. Oh. Wait. That's been done. Nevermind.
Current thread:
- Internet vulnerabilities Jason Lewis (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Jared Mauch (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Pete Ehlke (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Geo. (Jul 04)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities jnelson (Jul 04)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Phil Rosenthal (Jul 04)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Jason Lewis (Jul 04)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Jul 04)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Phil Rosenthal (Jul 04)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Dan Hollis (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Sandy Harris (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Jared Mauch (Jul 04)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Phil Rosenthal (Jul 04)