Re: OC-768 availability?

[Scott Granados <scott () graphidelix net>]

Not necessarily.  Don't forget that exchangecolo is in Hunters Point:) 
so its not totally unusual for people to put their networks in the hood. 
 :)

On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, David Charlap wrote:

> I think an OC-192 network using 56K modems in the core would be a pretty 
> obvious giveaway as well.
>
> -- David
>
> Rowland, Alan D wrote:
> > Compton, CA, US and Sealand would be the giveaways.
> >
> > Scott Weeks wrote:
> > > No, he's not for real.  It's a satire in the likes of Bandy Rush and such.
> > > Children need to have their fun...
> > >
> > > > dalph () hushmail com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am currently running a network of cisco 2621s with the OC-192 NM for my
> > > > upstream connections. The internal network links are a mixture of K56Flex
> > > > modems and GRE tunnels.
> > > >
> > > > I am looking to upgrade to OC-768 real soon now and am wondering what the
> > > > prospects are for OC-768 availability on the 2621 platform. I've found the
> > > > 2621 to be rock-solid, except when I ping it, so I'd like to keep my network
> > > > on that platform if possible.
> > > >
> > > > In addition, if anyone knows the availability of OC-768 circuits between the
> > > > following cities I'd appreciate any fiber maps and an approximate price
> > > > range:
> > > > Ottawa, ON, CA
> > > > Midland, ON, CA
> > > > Goderich, ON, CA
> > > > Toronto, ON, CA
> > > > Compton, CA, US
> > > > Sealand
> > > >
> > > > At each site I plan to announce a /24 from a /20 I was allocated so if
> > > > everyone could please update their prefix filters now that would be great.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > -- Dalph Roncaster