nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking Internet Gaming
From: Brian Wallingford <brian () meganet net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 21:58:40 -0500 (EST)
:Doesn't that cause trouble with occasionally blocking ephemeral ports? :If you're not allowing incoming connections of any kind (including :non-PASV FTP) it shouldn't matter, but blocking ports above 1024 :always makes me nervous... That's what "permit tcp any any established" is for. cheers, brian
Current thread:
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming, (continued)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Todd Suiter (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming James (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Jason Legate (Jan 09)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Dominic J. Eidson (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Dominic J. Eidson (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming Andy Walden (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Scott Gifford (Jan 06)
- RE: Blocking Internet Gaming James (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Scott Francis (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming achen-nanog (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Brian Wallingford (Jan 06)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Neil J. McRae (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Dan Schmiedt (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming sthaug (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Joe Abley (Jan 07)
- FWIW, Verisign buys .tv registry rights Richard Forno (Jan 07)
- Re: Blocking Internet Gaming Nathan J. Mehl (Jan 07)