nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS DOS increasing?
From: just me <matt () snark net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:18:10 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: So what we need is a tunable on the caching DNS server that says min_allowed_ttl = 300; if (ttl < min_allowed_ttl) ttl = min_allowed_ttl; If the above becomes a problem, this will happen. Mike. Some larger providers allready do this on their caching servers. It's rather annoying, actually. I don't see anything wrong with setting a 10s TTL if I size my bandwidth and server capacity accordingly. matto --mghali () snark net------------------------------------------<darwin>< Flowers on the razor wire/I know you're here/We are few/And far between/I was thinking about her skin/Love is a many splintered thing/Don't be afraid now/Just walk on in. #include <disclaim.h>
Current thread:
- RE: DNS DOS increasing?, (continued)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? James Smith (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? E.B. Dreger (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? Joel Baker (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? E.B. Dreger (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? E.B. Dreger (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? James Smith (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? Karyn Ulriksen (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? Rob Evans (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? James Smith (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? E.B. Dreger (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? just me (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? E.B. Dreger (Jan 21)
- Re: DNS DOS increasing? just me (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? Curtis Maurand (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? Curtis Maurand (Jan 21)
- RE: DNS DOS increasing? James Smith (Jan 22)