nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth
From: Marco d'Itri <md () Linux IT>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 01:28:57 +0100
On Feb 02, Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net> wrote:
The disadvantage is that it would potentially allow spammers to inject massive amounts of articles and servers would
It would not, because in the proposed protocol articles where signed by the sender site. The major drawback of that protocol is that it limits articles size to 64KB, so it does not reduce binary traffic, which is the largest part of a newsfeed. -- ciao, Marco
Current thread:
- Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Marco d'Itri (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Simon Lyall (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Sprunk (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Chris Adams (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Toerless Eckert (Feb 03)
- multicast resources (Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth) Jared Mauch (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Marco d'Itri (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 02)