nanog mailing list archives
Re: Satellite latency
From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:36:52 -0500
On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 10:18 , Jim Mercer wrote:
its been a while since i looked at it, but i seem to recall there was a lackof implementation/adhereance to that RFC in windows TCP stacks.
I don't think that has been the case for a while, now.
i think for RFC1323 to be effective, it needs to be working on the sendingand receiving systems, not just the intermediary routers.
RFC1323 can only be supported on TCP endpoints, so there's nothing you can or should do on intermediary routers.
There are good descriptions of general satellite transmission characteristics for IP together with a recipe book of mechanisms which can improve TCP performance in RFC2488. RFC2760 may also be interesting.
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Satellite latency Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Leo Bicknell (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Brett Frankenberger (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Michael Painter (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Joe Abley (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- RE: Satellite latency Tony Hain (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Leo Bicknell (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Satellite latency Rowland, Alan D (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Dickson, Brian (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Simon Lyall (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Chrisy Luke (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)
- RE: Satellite latency Jeb R. Linton (Feb 28)
- Re: Satellite latency Clayton Fiske (Feb 28)