nanog mailing list archives
Re: Satellite latency
From: Eric Gauthier <eric () roxanne org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:35:25 -0500
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Barb Dijker wrote:I have a tachyon.net system. 600ms is typical with a good aim.They use particularly slow tachyons :)
Since they move backwards in time, wouldn't "fast" tachyons take longer? Eric :)
Current thread:
- Re: Maformed SNMP Packet log/trace, (continued)
- Re: Maformed SNMP Packet log/trace Eric Brandwine (Feb 26)
- Re: Maformed SNMP Packet log/trace Sean Donelan (Feb 26)
- Re: Maformed SNMP Packet log/trace Paul Vixie (Feb 26)
- Re: Maformed SNMP Packet log/trace Richard A Steenbergen (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jeff Mcadams (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Roy (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency michael (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Barb Dijker (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency Eric Gauthier (Feb 26)
- Re: Satellite latency David R Huberman (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency David R Huberman (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 28)