nanog mailing list archives

Re: Strange behavior


From: Brian <bri () sonicboom org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:17:01 -0800 (PST)


asymmetric routing rearing its ugly head??

        Brian

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Charles Gucker wrote:


Strange,
      I'm not seeing the loss out to that atm interface.

 7  0.so-7-0-0.XL1.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.9.26)  27.931 ms  36.213 ms  36.588 ms
 8  307.at-2-1-0.XR1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.27.153)  37.648 ms  36.526 ms  35.544 ms
 9  0.so-2-2-0.XL1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.19.29)  35.122 ms  33.398 ms  32.955 ms
10  0.so-1-0-0.TL1.NYC8.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.137)  32.532 ms  32.520 ms  32.670 ms
11  0.SO-1-1-0.TL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.78)  96.295 ms  98.289 ms  99.398 ms
12  0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.55.105)  102.508 ms  105.129 ms  104.808 ms
13  POS1-0.XR1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.138)  104.300 ms  103.369 ms  103.271 ms
14  193.ATM7-0.GW5.SJC2.ALTER.NET (146.188.144.25)  106.969 ms *  101.883 ms

Charles Gucker
Cablevision

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:44:27PM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:

Greetings,

For the last two days I've seen massive delays around the following hops:
Does anyone have any thoughts on what is going on?


  9    15 ms    31 ms    32 ms  0.so-0-3-0.XL1.LAX9.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.2]
 10    32 ms    31 ms    31 ms  0.so-1-0-0.TL1.LAX9.ALTER.NET
[152.63.115.142]
 11    47 ms    31 ms    47 ms  0.so-4-0-0.TL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.98]
 12  1109 ms  1360 ms  1547 ms  0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SJC2.ALTER.NET
[152.63.55.105]
 13  2110 ms  2093 ms  2016 ms  POS1-0.XR1.SJC2.ALTER.NET [152.63.56.138]
 14  1906 ms  1766 ms  2046 ms  193.ATM7-0.GW5.SJC2.ALTER.NET
[146.188.144.25]

Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO
Broadband Laboratories
http://www.bblabs.com




Current thread: