nanog mailing list archives

Re: Operational Impact of CA-2002-03 ?

From: Chad Oleary <col () pobox com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:40:29 -0500 (EST)

Has anyone seen any discernable operational impact from CA-2002-03? Things

<snip>

I've only seen a couple hits here, however they were destined to
network addresses...

Feb 13 15:10:11 EST: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 112 denied udp
65.163.197.2(12154) -> 63.x.y.0(161), 1 packet
Feb 13 15:57:02 EST: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 112 denied udp
65.163.197.2(11290) -> 65.x.y.0(161), 1 packet

--Chad

Current thread:

Operational Impact of CA-2002-03 ? Frank B. Scalzo (Feb 13)
- Re: Operational Impact of CA-2002-03 ? Jared Mauch (Feb 14)
  - Re: Operational Impact of CA-2002-03 ? Brian Wallingford (Feb 14)
- Re: Operational Impact of CA-2002-03 ? Chad Oleary (Feb 14)
- Re: Operational Impact of CA-2002-03 ? Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
- Re: Operational Impact of CA-2002-03 ? Joel Baker (Feb 14)