nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth
From: David Charlap <David.Charlap () marconi com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 19:36:00 -0500
Michael Painter wrote:
Kinda' off topic, but I've seen this gibberish in many spam posts to usenet groups. What purpose does it serve?
Randomly generated, grammatically-correct (somewhat) text, designed to sneak the message past various filters (like anti-binary, and minimum- length.) I have no idea if it works or not. -- David
Current thread:
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 11)
- RE: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Deepak Jain (Feb 11)
- RE: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Vadim Antonov (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jonas M Luster (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Paul Vixie (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Stuart (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jonas M Luster (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Joe St Sauver (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Sprunk (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth David Charlap (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Stuart (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth David Schwartz (Feb 11)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Stuart (Feb 12)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth David Schwartz (Feb 12)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Stuart (Feb 12)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth David Schwartz (Feb 11)