nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:29:48 -0500
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:28:39PM -0500, Stephen Griffin wrote:
Actually, after confirming with Cisco, the above bug is different. Essentially, if a router has two links, and a route in both iBGP and iMBGP with same igp distance, local pref, mask, etc, the unicast BGP route is chosen for RPF, rather than the multicast route. This would lead to using the "wrong" interface. Although it is related in that, if the RPF check was done against the MRIB first, it would solve this bug.
does "ip multicast multipath" help you at all either? that should cause it to rpf down both paths. - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Chris Adams (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Toerless Eckert (Feb 03)
- multicast resources (Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth) Jared Mauch (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 04)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Alex Rubenstein (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth jlewis (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth measl (Feb 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Robert Boyle (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Vadim Antonov (Feb 08)