nanog mailing list archives
Re: FW: /8s and filtering
From: David Schwartz <davids () webmaster com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:57:04 -0800
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:45:42 -0800 (PST), Harsha Narayan wrote:
Doesn't this mean that unless filtering policies change, after Class C space is used up, the multihomer will have to get a /22 from the ISP (since after Class C gets used up allocations will be made from Class A space). There are only three /8s left in the Class C space.
No. Providers who you don't pay to carry your route can reach you through the larger aggregate. In fact, even the /24 requirement can be ignored if all your providers reach each other directly or can convince their transit providers to carry smaller routes. DS
Current thread:
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering, (continued)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering David Schwartz (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering N (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering David Schwartz (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Tim Thorne (Dec 11)
- RE: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- RE: FW: /8s and filtering Brian (Dec 10)
- RE: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- RE: FW: /8s and filtering Brian (Dec 10)