nanog mailing list archives
Re: FW: /8s and filtering
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Hello, Now I am confused because I have got two sets of contradicting answers. Some say that anyone can multihome, some say that you need to be of a certain minimum size to multihome. May I know what is the right answer? I agree that allowing anyone to multihome would increase the size of the routing table. So does this mean that someone has to be of a certain size to multihome? Harsha.
anyone can multihome, with the cooperation of others. current practice seems to dictate that the standard operating procedures to protect the integrity of the routing system mandate that only prefixes of certain lengths are allowed at -SOME- isp boundaries. you seem to have the assumption that there is a single standard here. There is not. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: /8s and filtering, (continued)
- Re: /8s and filtering David Schwartz (Dec 10)
- Re: /8s and filtering Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: /8s and filtering bdragon (Dec 10)
- Re: /8s and filtering Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: /8s and filtering bdragon (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Forrest (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering N (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Forrest (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering David Schwartz (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: /8s and filtering David Schwartz (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering David Schwartz (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering Harsha Narayan (Dec 10)
- Re: FW: /8s and filtering N (Dec 10)