nanog mailing list archives
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 04:09:36 +0000 (UCT)
I will go out on a limb and say that a reduction in the cost of stratum-1 servers will increase their use across the Internet. The results of such an increase would be arguably visible, as the current multi-layer timekeeping system seems to be more-or-less keeping clocks correct to the point of usefulness, at least from a layer-4-and-up standpoint.
The point ought to be made that a dense mesh of stratum-2 sources is likely more robust/accurate than a single stratum-1 source... --bill
Current thread:
- Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Leber (Aug 26)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Lyon (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Karsten W. Rohrbach (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server CARL . P . HIRSCH (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Lyon (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server John Todd (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server bmanning (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server David G. Andersen (Aug 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server David G. Andersen (Aug 28)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server John Todd (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Lyon (Aug 27)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Robert E. Seastrom (Aug 28)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 28)
- Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Johannes Ullrich (Aug 28)