nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSPs filter?
From: <bdragon () gweep net>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 12:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
Filtering piddly stuff like this without consultation is usually unwelcome at best, and a disruption at worst. It is also a serious investment of time and acl resources which could be better spent somewhere else. And lastly, it sets a bad precedent for what ISPs "can" do to proactively filter. After all, if we "can" do this, why can't we also filter illegal MP3 exchanges too.
One is envelope, the other is payload. Until there is some technical means of "return to sender" for IP, filtering bad envelopes is the next best thing.
Current thread:
- Re: NSPs filter?, (continued)
- Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? bmanning (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Måns Nilsson (Aug 14)
- Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Jared Mauch (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Scott Granados (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? bdragon (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Aug 05)
- RE: NSPs filter? Barry Raveendran Greene (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Jared Mauch (Aug 05)
- Re: routing table size k claffy (Aug 07)
- Re: routing table size David G. Andersen (Aug 07)
- Message not available
- Re: routing table size David G. Andersen (Aug 08)
- RE: NSPs filter? Hank Nussbacher (Aug 05)
- BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 Alan Sawyer (Aug 05)