nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones
From: tim.thorne () btinternet com (Tim Thorne)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:57:38 GMT
Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com> wrote:
SO, wouldn't canceling China Telecom BGP through AT&T CW and UUnet do nothing except cause some BGP advertisement changes at Internap ?
I'm not even sure if shutting listen4ever down is on the RIAA agenda. Wouldn't the easiest course of action be to file suit against Verisign and have their DNS nuked? Tim
Current thread:
- Major Labels v. Backbones John Ferriby (Aug 16)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 16)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones blitz (Aug 16)
- Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 16)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones senthil ayyasamy (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks (Aug 19)
- RE: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Deepak Jain (Aug 19)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen Stuart (Aug 19)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne (Aug 19)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Joe Baptista (Aug 19)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 16)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Ralph Doncaster (Aug 17)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Petri Helenius (Aug 18)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks (Aug 18)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne (Aug 18)
- Anyone from Prodigy or L3 listening? (W32/Yaha Complaint) Richard Forno (Aug 18)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 19)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Greg Maxwell (Aug 19)