nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones
From: smd () clock org (Sean M. Doran)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 05:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Hm, why stop with just backbone networks? Why shouldn't edge networks, corporate networks, and household networks chip in to uphold civil judgements against infringers? Surely I should not object if the RIAA insists that I block access of my small collection of computers to hosts which exist solely to distribute infringing material? Surely Dr Farber has already volunteered to adjust his own border filtering, since it is no great inconvenience to do so, the case is clear-cut, and this bad law is still on the books and therefore should continue to be followed. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean M. Doran (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Paul Vixie (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Johannes Ullrich (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Vadim Antonov (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Paul Vixie (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 17)