Re: Echo

[Brad Knowles <brad.knowles () skynet be>]

At 9:43 PM +0200 2002/08/16, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:

>  Brad Knowles(brad.knowles () skynet be)@2002.08.16 19:48:10 +0000:
> >         What kinds of anti-abuse protection methods have people used for
> >  "echo" accounts that they have set up?
>
>  - scoreboard: one mail from one source addres in one minute time window

	Yeah, but then abusers could easily generate elephantine 
quantities of messages, simply by randomly generating return 
addresses (if they wanted to DoS you or your network), or by randomly 
generating the user portion of return addresses (if they wanted to 
abuse you to DoS someone else).  If they know that there are multiple 
domains handled by the same servers, they could randomly generate 
addresses within that set of domains.

>  - gnupg: mail needs to be signed to fire a return mail. key of the
>    signer must belong to the robot's gpg trust web.

	Ooh, so in order to use the echo server, they have to send a PGP 
signed message?  Wow, that's pretty expensive.  That sounds like a 
really excellent way to DoS your server.


        Thanks for sharing!

--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles () skynet be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)