nanog mailing list archives

RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon


From: Vadim Antonov <avg () exigengroup com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:54:34 -0700 (PDT)


On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:


At 5:13 PM -0500 2002/08/13, Blake Fithen wrote:

 Is this sensitive info?   Couldn't someone (theoretically) aim a
 "beam" at an unoccupied office and another at their objective
 office then filter out the 'noise'?

      Actually, I don't know for sure how it's implemented.  They may 
have separate sound streams for each window.  Moreover, this was a 
few years ago (I left in 1995), and there may have been changes since 
then.  It would certainly be a lot easier to use individual speakers 
fed by electrical wiring, than pumping a lot of air around from a 
central location.

Even easier is to glue a piezoelectric transducer to the glass and feed
it some noise modulated to look like speech from a gadget which may cost
entire $30 in parts.  Detecting IR laser emissions and sounding alarm is
also a good idea :)

--vadim


Current thread: