nanog mailing list archives

Re: your mail


From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 20:54:38 -0400 (EDT)


One might also note that looking at the headers of most webmail services
enables you to figure out where they work anyway...

Charles

--
Charles Sprickman
spork () inch com


On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Scott Granados wrote:


Do people really almost get fired for what they write here?  I'd think
there would be more constructive things to do by management than read
nanog for questionable posts.  If I were managing someone and they
posted their feeling on a subject and clearly said it was their own who
am I to have a problem with that.  It might be in my best interest and
listen to them then silence them.

On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Ukyo Kuonji wrote:


Sorry, but there are valid reasons for posting anonymously.  As one person
that almost got fired from a company for expressing what was clearly marked
as his own opinion to this list, I can attest to this.  Some employers are
concerned that you post during working hours, some are concerned that you
use a work address, some are concerned that anything you say, no matter what
email you use, will be considered as representations of the company's
direction, even if it is clearly marked as not.

I like helping and sharing my opinions, but I'm not willing to loose my job
over it.

UK

Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Wallingford <brian () meganet net>

Perhaps it's time to bar posting privileges from those who insist on
remaining entirely anonymous?

I doubt that anyone who has anything substantive to offer would need to
use a hushmail/yahoo/etc. return address.

The initial posts from Bandy, Vaul, et al were mildly amusing at first,
but the novelty wore out very quickly.


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Current thread: