nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSPs filter?
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart () tech org>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 18:07:37 -0700
Would you care to take a shot at answering my question, or is contributing productively too much to ask?My employer believes against filtering on source or destination.
Are you at liberty to share that reason for that? If you know that the source address is bogus (for whatever reason, RFC1918 source address is my favorite example), why not act on the fact that it is bogus? Is it economic - are you collecting revenue for that traffic? Do you believe that the router's performance or stability are adversely affected by restricting the traffic that you pass in any manner? Stephen
Current thread:
- RE: NSPs filter?, (continued)
- RE: NSPs filter? Hank Nussbacher (Aug 05)
- BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 Alan Sawyer (Aug 05)
- Re: BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 cw (Aug 06)
- Re: BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 Rob Pickering (Aug 06)
- Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Aug 04)
- Re: my sig jnull (Aug 07)
- Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Aug 07)
- Re: NSPs filter? David Schwartz (Aug 08)
- Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Aug 08)