Re: Praise to XO's Security/Abuse

[JC Dill <nanog () vo cnchost com>]

On 04:36 PM 8/30/02, John M. Brown wrote:
>
>
>Jason at XO's security/abuse staff.  Very helpful chap

Indeed he is.  Which is why I'm totally mystified about why rfc-ignorant 
insists that my domain doesn't have a working abuse address.  I would 
privately email the admin at rfc-ignorant about this problem, but, well.... 
(see below)

jc

>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON () wellington cnchost com>
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>Message-ID: <200208262053.QAA27667 () wellington cnchost com>
>Errors-To: <MAILER-DAEMON () wellington cnchost com>
>To: <lists () vo cnchost com>
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>X-UIDL: 59729
>
>The original message was received at Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
>from adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net [208.201.244.240]
>
>   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><admin () rfc-ignorant com>
>
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to narn.megacity.org.:
>>>> RCPT To:<admin () rfc-ignorant com>
><<< 550 5.7.1 <admin () rfc-ignorant com>... Message rejected because the
>connecting host (wellington.concentric.net) does not have abuse contact -
>see www.rfc-ignorant.org
>550 <admin () rfc-ignorant com>... User unknown
>
>   ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Return-Path: <lists () vo cnchost com>
>Received: from Erwin.vo.cnchost.com (adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net
>[208.201.244.240])
>    by wellington.cnchost.com
>    id QAA27406; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
>    [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14]
>Errors-To: <lists () vo cnchost com>
>Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20020826135320.02fa2340 () pop3 vo cnchost com>
>X-Sender: lists%vo.cnchost.com () pop3 vo cnchost com
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
>Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:55:30 -0700
>To: admin () rfc-ignorant com
>From: JC Dill <abuse () vo cnchost com>
>Subject: Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>Can you explain why rfc-ignorant thinks my domain doesn't have a working
>abuse address?
>
>jc