nanog mailing list archives

RE: Configure SNMP for non udp 161 port


From: "Tony Rall" <trall () almaden ibm com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:07:37 -0800


Please explain how.  The only form of PAT that I'm familiar with 
translates source ports, not destination ports.  It is the latter that 
would be required in this situation.

Cisco Pix, at least, has a feature that could do this on traffic passing 
through it - "port redirection".  Of course, this would require sending 
the messages through an additional box.  See: 
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/28.html

Tony Rall

Sent by:        owner-nanog () merit edu
To:     "'Holmes, Daniel'" <dholmes () aprisma com>
cc:     "'nanog () merit edu'" <nanog () merit edu> 
Subject:        RE: Configure SNMP for non udp 161 port



you could use PAT

-----Original Message-----
From: Holmes, Daniel [mailto:dholmes () aprisma com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:37 AM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Configure SNMP for non udp 161 port

Does anyone know off hand how to configure a cisco router to respond to 
SNMP
v1/v2 requests on a udp port other than 161 (default)

Thanks - Dan


Current thread: