nanog mailing list archives

RE: Large ISPs doing NAT?


From: "Daniska Tomas" <tomas () tronet com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:36:32 +0200


jb,

i've seen this as a part of turnkey solution by one of gprs vendors. they made two service classes - generic 
(10.0.0.0/8-based with nat) and 'privileged' - with registered addresses. and it was not only a slideware but a real 
installation

but then you have many other large-scale issues like access acceleration, content optimization etc...

--
 
Tomas Daniska
systems engineer
Tronet Computer Networks
Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
 
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by blowing first.



-----Original Message-----
From: Beckmeyer [mailto:beck () pacbell net] 
Sent: 29. apríla 2002 18:08
To: tme () multicasttech com; nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?



Marshall et al,

It's a lack of IP Address Space - and the numbers I gave - 10's of 
thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short 
order it will 
be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses.  To start with, I'm willing to 
think in terms of 10's of thousands spread over a handful of "POPs".

The application is GPRS (aka 2.5/3G cellular) and each Internet 
connected user or some major subset of them will likely wind 
up with an 
address on their mobile device.  

- JB




Current thread: