nanog mailing list archives
Re: genuity - any good?
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () asr org>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:13:57 -0400
On 2002-04-11-19:16:57, matthew zeier <matthew () velvet org> wrote:
I've gotten attractive pricing from Genuity but I haven't used them in a couple years. Is there any reason I wouldn't want to use them as a third upstream OC3 provider?
Current thread:
- Re: genuity - any good?, (continued)
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 12)
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)
- limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 13)
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) German Martinez (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 15)
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Jesper Skriver (Apr 13)
- RE: genuity - any good? Daniel Golding (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)