nanog mailing list archives

Re: Load balancing in routers

From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:29:21 -0500


Thus spake "Peter Panagakos" <ppanagakos () nuvo com>

Is this still the norm? In regards to not using "no ip route-cache".

I recall reading somewhere in Cisco documentation that in BGP
multihomed scenarios that it was the preferred method of control
on non-CEF gear.


If that's still in the documentation, it's an oversight.  Please see my
other message on the performance effects of process switching.

S

Current thread:

RE: packet reordering at exchange points, (continued)
- - - RE: packet reordering at exchange points Jim Forster (Apr 10)
    - Re: packet reordering at exchange points Craig Partridge (Apr 11)
    - Re: packet reordering at exchange points Jesper Skriver (Apr 09)
    - Re: packet reordering at exchange points Stephen Sprunk (Apr 08)
    - Re: packet reordering at exchange points Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 09)
    - Re: packet reordering at exchange points Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 08)
    - Re: packet reordering at exchange points Jesper Skriver (Apr 08)
    - Re: Load balancing in routers Chris Woodfield (Apr 08)
    - Re: Load balancing in routers Tony Tauber (Apr 08)
- RE: Load balancing in routers Gironda, Andre (Apr 08)
- Re: Load balancing in routers Stephen Sprunk (Apr 11)