nanog mailing list archives
Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:34:11 -0500
Some providers even use /31s on peering interfaces if the other side can also. Most modern router software supports this feature. - jared On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:48:59AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all, Just (mostly) out of personal curiousity - is anyone here running any PtP links using 31 bit prefixes rather than the /30's we're all happy with? If you go "huh?" take a look at rfc3021 - "Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links" Thanks, Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "For a sucessful technology, reality must <adrian () creative net au> take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled" - Feynmann
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- 31 bit ptp link addressing? Adrian Chadd (Apr 05)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Stephen Griffin (Apr 05)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Jared Mauch (Apr 05)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Adrian Chadd (Apr 13)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Adrian Chadd (Apr 15)