nanog mailing list archives
Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:40:47 +0000 (UCT)
Being at the end of a 6,000 foot T1 circuit to a CO is the worst of both worlds.
Hum... but in this case I have direct control on the physical access to my hardware. For some, this outweighes the "proximity to diversity" of telecoms paths. If I want (non-authentic) copies of the data spread far and wide, thats a service I can buy from a number of suppliers. I don't have to put -MY- hardware close to the telecoms mesh. I want my keyserver where I know I can protect it from barbarian hordes. In such a case, a long, thin gauntlet might be the best choice. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset), (continued)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Joseph T. Klein (Sep 25)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Matt Levine (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) mike harrison (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) E.B. Dreger (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Timothy R. McKee (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Vivien M. (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Joel Jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Adam Rothschild (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) ray (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Sean Donelan (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) bmanning (Sep 25)
- Re: National infrastructure asset Jim Popovitch (Sep 23)