nanog mailing list archives
RE: 12000 ACL issue
From: "Chance Whaley" <chance () dreamscope com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 23:09:52 -0600
Your right. I think it was just _yesterday_ that the cisco's OC48 interface could actually do OC48 rates.. :) Everyone is "bitching" because they need functionality to support their product base. You/Marketing/Sales (ISP) sells a product to a customer - you in turn need functionality from your vendors. The cycle does not stop or slow.. Your customer: "I want everything, and I want it for less money." You to you vendor: "I want everything, and I want it for less money." Your vendor to their suppliers: "I want everything, and I want it for less money." This "bitching" is how new innovations are made, prices fall, and technology moves on. Short memories are a good thing - without them most of us would never be repeat customers of our vendors. ;) .chance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Goodwin, Dustin T [IT] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:35 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: 12000 ACL issue It seems like just yesterday everyone was blown away by an OC-48 capable router. Now everyone is bitching that they can't apply access lists on 8 port GE card. I am absolutely blown away by what a short memory everyone in this industry has. - Dustin -
Current thread:
- Re: 12000 ACL issue, (continued)
- Re: 12000 ACL issue Eric Gauthier (Oct 19)
- Re: 12000 ACL issue Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 20)
- RE: 12000 ACL issue Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Oct 19)
- RE: 12000 ACL issue Pete Kruckenberg (Oct 19)
- 6500 Supervisor IOS/Native mode (RE: 12000 ACL issue) Pete Kruckenberg (Oct 27)
- Message not available
- Re: 6500 Supervisor IOS/Native mode (RE: 12000 ACL issue) Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Oct 27)
- RE: 12000 ACL issue Chance Whaley (Oct 20)
- RE: 12000 ACL issue Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Oct 21)
- RE: 12000 ACL issue Chance Whaley (Oct 20)