nanog mailing list archives

Re: Thoughts on BGP and Shared Hosting Environments


From: Brian Whalen <bri () sonicboom org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:33:13 -0700 (PDT)


It would be interesting to know what is happening to traffic in the broken
2x/21 setup.  Did the various looking glasses see it correctly?  Is it out
of traditional class a space, or that new block just assigned to apnic?

Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity


On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:


Had an interesting situation yesterday.

Received a new /20 allocation.
Split it into /19's and advertised it to two separate backbones via two
separate routers.

Users on the new /19's could get to about 75% of the available web hosts on
the internet.

I removed the /19's and advertised the entire /20 out of both servers,
problem resolved.

Any suggestions?

Also, what are the groups opinions on web hosting customers who want to
install custom ASP and COM components on a shared Windows 2000/IIS hosting
server?  I'm having a debate with a sales dude over this issue.

My opinion is that it potentially destabilizes all of the virtual hosts on
that system.  When I hear "Can you install just a couple of ASP or COM
components on my domain" my mind immediately goes to putting this customer
in their own dedicated colo server.  I don't think its right to jeopardize
several hundred virtual domains because one $19.99/month customer wants to
load up a special .dll.  But that's just my rant, market conditions can
dictate otherwise.

Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP, CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
email:chris () bblabs com
phone:520.622.4338 x234



Current thread: