nanog mailing list archives

Re: Last NYC 9/11 Internet repairs


From: "Mike Moglin" <mike () jungle net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 20:48:58 -0500


I can't speak for anyone else, but I know that my company was not offered
any alternatives what so ever.  As a matter of fact in a conversation
earlier today the tech on the phone joked that I could have had new service
installed faster than this is getting repaired.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Donelan" <sean () donelan com>
To: "Mike Moglin" <mike () jungle net>
Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: Last NYC 9/11 Internet repairs



On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Mike Moglin wrote:
Let me clarify...

Several customers in lower Manhattan using UUNet DSL (they resell covad)
are
still experiencing outages, they've closed all the tickets and rolled
them
up into a master ticket.

As of September 24, COVAD reported less than 450 DSL customers were
without service, out of an original 30,000.  The remaining customers
were served by Verizon loops out of 140 West St.

I believe UUNET (as well as several other providers) have offered
customers the option to restore some service through alternative
product offerings.  This includes wireless, dialup, and installing
service in other locations.

Are you claiming those UUNET customers weren't offered alternate
ways to restore their service?  Or they declined the offer, and
prefer to wait for their DSL service whenever it may be restored?






Current thread: