Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases

[Philip Smith <pfs () cisco com>]

At 17:48 27/11/2001 -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <5.1.0.14.2.20011128081413.00aa29f0@localhost>, Philip Smith 
> writes:
> >
> >My theory is that DISO-UNRRA were originally allocated 132.1.0.0/16 through
> >132.15.0.0/16 in the classful world - these are all in the ARIN DB under
> >various military guises. When CIDR came along, it seems that someone must
> >have decided that because 132.0.0.0/16 was now available and part of a
> >bigger block, it could be added to the announcement, etc...?
> >
> >There are a total of four like this:
> >
> >Network            Origin AS  Description
> >132.0.0.0/10           568     DISO-UNRRA
> >135.0.0.0/13         10455     Lucent Technologies
> >137.0.0.0/13           568     DISO-UNRRA
> >158.0.0.0/13           568     DISO-UNRRA
>
> Umm -- how does Lucent fit into that?  Last I checked, it wasn't part
> of DoD.

Where did I say that Lucent was part of DoD? ;-) I said there were a total 
of four announcements where the first /16 was announced as part of a larger 
CIDR block, but not listed as being allocated to anyone...

It seems to me that in these 4 cases the organisations concerned simply 
decided that CIDRisation meant that the first /16 was theirs...

philip
--