nanog mailing list archives

Re: win95 and IEAK6.0


From: Joshua Coombs <network-nanog () gwi net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:33:34 -0500


On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Patrick Muldoon wrote:




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf
Of
Joshua Coombs
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:08 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: win95 and IEAK6.0


While it may be sooner than some would like, I've no qualms with
Microsoft cutting off older versions of software.  Just think how
much smoother and stabler Win95 could have been if MS bit the bullet
and
dumped DOS/win 3.1 support?

In any case, why do your customers HAVE to use the latest IEAK package
to connect to your service?  Is it not possible to keep older versions
on hand for older systems?

I believe in the Microsoft Liscense for the IEAK.  That when a new
version is released you MUST upgrade to it in a reasonable amount of
time.  I am not sure about the exact wording as it has been a while
since I messed with the IEAK.

Wow, MS left something to user intruptation in a EULA?!  Heh, welp, to
me a reasonable amount of time would be, oh, 6 years? : )  In all
seriousness, I think that's one of the gray areas that push comes to
shove, one could argue against and win legally.

I'm not a lawyer though, so don't hold me to that.


Joshua Coombs

* jcoombs () gwi net
- All opinions, statements and outright lies 
- contained within are copyright 2001 by
- Joshua Coombs and shall not be reprinted
- or publicly displayed without ignoring this
- useless boilerplate.


-Patrick 


--
Patrick Muldoon, Network/Software Engineer
INOC, LLC
doon () inoc net 

I am still waiting for the advent of the computer science groupie.



Joshua Coombs

* jcoombs () gwi net
- All opinions, statements and outright lies
- contained within are copyright 2001 by
- Joshua Coombs and shall not be reprinted
- or publicly displayed without ignoring this
- useless boilerplate.







Current thread: