nanog mailing list archives

Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP)

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:59:01 -0400

On Fri, 25 May 2001 15:49:54 BST, "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>  said:

Methinks that it's proxy time.  Why not hack the popular MTAs so that they
take attachments, spool them in a Web-accessible directory, then modify
the message.

Just like e-cards...


message/external-body was first described in RFC1341, in June 1992. Hardly
a new idea...

/Valdis

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) E.B. Dreger (May 25)
- Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
  - Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) E.B. Dreger (May 25)
- Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) Matt Martini (May 26)
  - Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) Greg A. Woods (May 26)
- Re: Possible solution? (e-mail parcel vs. FTP) Sabri Berisha (May 28)