nanog mailing list archives
Re: black hat .cn networks
From: mike harrison <meuon () highertech net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
Oh for the love of god, 15 web sites get defaced and it's suddenly worth trying to deny internet access to a billion people?Really; statistically, it'd make more sense to block .com and .net.
Agreed. Although I did spend some time today going over DDOS and other attack response methods with my people. I figure if I were Chinese, I'd be relayed into some clueless newbies new 1+ghz pentium with a fresh RedHat 7.0 install on a fast connection INSIDE the US and then relay into other boxen from there before really attacking. It may be a busy week, what about the native 'elite' that decide this is the perfect cover for rampant mayhem? Remember when you trusted people on the 'net just a little bit?
Current thread:
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: black hat .cn networks ken harris. (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Sabri Berisha (May 01)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Jeffrey Wheat (May 01)
- Re: black hat .cn networks mike harrison (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (May 01)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (May 01)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Eric A. Hall (May 01)
- Korea contact info: [Re: black hat .cn networks] Rafi Sadowsky (May 01)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (May 01)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Henry R. Linneweh (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (May 01)
- Re: black hat .cn networks scott w (May 01)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Alex Pilosov (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks John Fraizer (Apr 30)