nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?
From: Albert Meyer <albert () waller net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 11:16:25 -0500
Didn't UUNet try this back in 96? A quick search of Boardwatch failed to find the article, but ISTR that John Sidgemore eventually slunk back to the playground and agreed to play nice. If UUNet couldn't pull it off back then, I doubt that CW can now. Things have changed a lot in 5 years, but I would suspect that "Stealing the Internet" would now be harder rather than easier.
At 01:31 PM 5/6/01 -0500, Joseph T. Klein wrote:
It seems to be worthy of note that AGIS and PSI tried to use the "pay me don't peer" card before they deteriorated.
Current thread:
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? David Schwartz (May 05)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? John Payne (May 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Richard A. Steenbergen (May 05)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Daniel Golding (May 05)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Tony Mumm (May 06)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Joseph T. Klein (May 06)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Albert Meyer (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Paul Vixie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Peter van Dijk (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Joseph T. Klein (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Simon Lyall (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Peter van Dijk (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? David Schwartz (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? hardie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Jeff Mcadams (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? David Schwartz (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 08)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Daniel Golding (May 05)