Re: Last Mile QoS WAS: RE: QOS or more bandwidth

[Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>]

Hi

 Sorry about the previous  (content free :-( ) Email
May I suggest reading (and following links from)

  <http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-mlppp.html>

(Scanning for "cRTP" & "Interleaving" should be useful)

 Also you could follow some interesting links from the above URL
For Example:

 <http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/pkt-voice-general/bwidth_consume.html>

Enjoy
        Rafi


On Tue, 29 May 2001, Nathan Stratton wrote:

> On Tue, 29 May 2001, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
>
> > A 1536-byte frame has a fairly significant impact (~8ms) at
> > 1.5Mb/s. QoS appears to have diminishing return as you move
> > beyond 45Mbps, at least as far as multi-service networks go.
> > Maybe QoS isn't necessary or useful in the core if you have
> > line-speed switching and no congestion on an OC-X/DWDM
> > network.
>
> It has even a larger impact on a 128K frac T1 (~93ms). QoS is a big help,
> but at slower speeds you also need to deal with fragmentation and the
> layer 2 transport. I am surprised that there has been so little movement
> as far as QoS and efficiency in regards to VoIP. Take a standard voice call
> using G.726 at 32 kbps, you get 40 bytes of voice every 10 ms. Now add on
> your 20 byte IP header, 8 bytes UDP, and 12 byte RTP header. So now we are
> at 80 bytes and most of the time we are shoving this on ATM so our 32K
> voice stream now sucks 84.8 kbps.
>
> If you are interested in more info on QoS and Voice/Data over last mine
> networks check out my website:
>
> http://www.robotics.net/papers/integratedvoice.html
>
>
> > <>
> Nathan Stratton                               CTO, Exario Networks, Inc.
> nathan () robotics net                     nathan () exario net
> http://www.robotics.net                 http://www.exario.net