nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL holes again.
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:37:33 -0500
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:17:22PM -0500, M. David Leonard wrote:
what they were doing. It appears that most people - even those who haven't read the appropriate RFCs - fully expect ALL e-mail to be delivered to the intended recipient(s).
Especially those who've read the 1986 law requiring it.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: AOL holes again., (continued)
- Re: AOL holes again. Derek J. Balling (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Alan Clegg (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. ken harris. (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Peter van Dijk (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. M. David Leonard (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Steve Sobol (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- RE: AOL holes again. M. David Leonard (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Dan Hollis (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Alan Clegg (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. James M. Shuler III (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Wayne (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)