nanog mailing list archives
Re: Statements against new.net?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:31:34 +0800
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
Because the current DNS has a single contention point, it is very vulnerable. It can be very easily taken over by a large corporate entity.The let's design a better system.
<TONGUE POSITION="CHEEK"> When its done, can we please move it the hell out of the US? </TONGUE> Perhaps we should all shift this to a DNS list? Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "The fact you can download a 100 megabyte file <adrian () creative net au> from half way around the world should be viewed as an accident and not a right." -- Adrian Chadd and Bill Fumerola
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Scott Francis (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adrian Chadd (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Eric A. Hall (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 17)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Mark Kosters (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- RE: Statements against new.net? Ben Browning (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Scott Francis (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adrian Chadd (Mar 15)
- DNS Control mike harrison (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS Control Jim Dixon (Mar 15)
- Re: DNS Control mike harrison (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Joe Abley (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Daniel Roesen (Mar 15)